Blogging | Blogging news

... Raiders Got Their Guy, but Is it the Right Guy?

- Sports Blog AOL NEWS FanHouse Blogs FanHouse Main NFL NBA MLB NCAA Basketball Alabama Arizona Arkansas Boston College Butler Clemson California Cincinnati Connecticut DePaul Duke Florida George Mason George Washington Georgetown Georgia Tech Gonzaga Illinois Indiana Iowa State Kansas Kentucky Louisville LSU Marquette Maryland Memphis Michigan Michigan State NC State Nevada North Carolina Notre Dame Ohio State Oklahoma Oklahoma State Oregon Pittsburgh Seton Hall South Carolina Syracuse Stanford Tennessee Texas Texas A&M Texas Tech UCLA Umass USC Villanova Wake Forest Washington Washington State West Virginia Wisconsin Wichita State Xavier NCAA Football NASCAR NHL Other Sports FanHouse Mobile Resources Send Us Tips Contact Us Corrections Problems FanHouse Feed Feeds By Category Blog Roll A Sea of Blue ACC Basketblog Big East Basketball Report Big Ten Wonk Chris West Hoops Cracked Sidewalks Husky Blog Illini Wonk Ken Pomeroy Phog Blog SJU Hawks Blog The Bracket Board The Fieldhouse Yoco Hoops Raiders Got Their Guy, but Is it the Right Guy?

Posted Apr 28th 2007 12:28PM by Ryan WilsonFiled under: Raiders, AFC West, NFL DraftOkay, no real surprises with the JaMarcus Russell pick, but the FanHouse's Michael David Smith asks a good question: Am I the only one who thinks JaMarcus Russell could end up being the...

...Pam, Brian and Anton were there and we introduced some new interesting people to the wonderful world of If you are in the Triangle NC area, we are doing the same thing next week - same place and time: Durham public library 10am-12noon.

Send this entry to: Email this entry to a friend View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry TrackBacks TrackBack URL for this entry: Post a Comment (Email is required for authentication purposes only.

Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately.

Thanks for waiting.) Name: Email Address: URL: Comments: (you may use HTML tags for style) Having problems commenting?

ScienceBlogs home Last 24 Hours About ScienceBlogs Syndication Feeds (RSS) Email Subscriptions Search All Blogs Blogs in the Network All Blogs A Blog Around The Clock Aardvarchaeology Adventures in Ethics and Science Aetiology Afarensis Chaotic Utopia The Cheerful Oncologist Cognitive Daily commonground The Corpus Callosum The Daily Transcript Deep Sea News Deltoid Developing Intelligence Discovering Biology in a Digital World Dispatches from the Culture Wars Dr.

Joan Bushwell's Chimpanzee Refuge Dynamics of Cats Effect Measure evolgen EvolutionBlog Evolving Thoughts The Examining Room of Dr.

Charles Framing Science The Frontal Cortex Galactic Interactions Gene Expression Good Math, Bad Math Highly Allochthonous Integrit...

... National Ledger - Hillary Clinton or Wal-Mart for Health Care?

An Eclectic Mix* News Links Font Size: Small Medium Large Hillary Clinton or Wal-Mart for Health Care?

By Jackson Simpson Apr 28, 2007 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took what many thought was a backhanded shot at American retail giant Wal-Mart during a debate this week with the other Democratic presidential candidates.

When debate moderator Brian Williams asked presidential candidate Hillary Clinton last night whether she thought that Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

(NYSE: WMT) was bad or good for America, some strong words came out reports 'Hillary Clinton Criticism of Wal-Mart Answered "Well because when Wal-Mart started, it brought goods into rural areas, like rural Arkansas where I was happy to live for 18 years.

And it gave people a chance to stretch their dollar further.

But as they grew much bigger, though, they have raised serious questions about the responsibility of corporations and how they need to be a leader when it comes to providing health care and having safe working conditions and not discriminating on the basis of sex or race or any other category." She added, "Brian, this is all part, though, of how this Administration and corporate America today don't see middle class and working Americans.

They are invisible.

They don't ...